Showing posts with label sacrament. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sacrament. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 6, 2013

Nearness and Encounter



There are two things that define the people of God as we respond to the call of Jesus and assume the full mantle of the Great Commission to “make disciples of all nations”: nearness and encounter.  That’s how Pope Francis sees it anyway.

Surely we can draw up strategic plans and organizational grids (many of us may be doing just that as we gear up for another year of ministry/life/work/parenthood). But it is not the efficiencies of Modernity that have broken through the busyness of our age and the distraction of our hearts. It is God’s intimacy, revealed in a humble babe. It is a lowly servant that has transformed us. “He is the ‘God who is near’ to his people,” Pope Francis proclaimed in a recent address to the South American episcopate, “a nearness which culminates in the Incarnation.  He is the God who goes forth to meet his people.”[1]

People aren’t reached by programs. Kids (and adults alike) are reached by people. It’s being there. It’s showing up. It’s a phone call in a sea of emails. It’s a hand-written note in a world of texts. It’s a hug when only a hug will do. It’s going out and taking risks. It’s being shot down a time or two. It’s offering your heart with all the vulnerability of Jesus on the Cross. It’s laying your life down for the sake of a friend.

All too often we exchange the mission for the institution of the Church today. No doubt, a natural process of institutionalization is necessary to make universally accessible the life-giving kernel of God’s transformative power. The institution preserves and magnifies the mission. Yet when maintenance overtakes mission as the sole priority of the Church, our message becomes stale and our witness empty. To borrow Francis’ words, the Church “stops being a bride and ends up being an administrator; from being a servant, she becomes an ‘inspector’.”[2] All the while, kids, oblivious to all of our plans and procedures, councils and commissions, stand at the fray waiting for someone to step in and be the body of Christ, to draw near as a sacramental embodiment of God, to sanctify their existence by actually saying “hello.”

It’s not a business plan, it's an abiding presence. We are not “keepers of the aquarium” but “fishers of men [and women].”[3] We are lights unto the world, icons of the living God. And when we draw near to others in tenderness, mercy and personal friendship, we not only imitate God but we participate in the tender, merciful and thoroughly personal being-in-action, being-in-relation, triune reality we call God. The Incarnation has brought a “revolution of tenderness,” Pope Francis reminds us, one that can reach the lonely and the neglected, the rebellious and the reticent, the broken and the proud.

It is this nearness, this personal encounter with our fellow brothers and sojourning sisters, that makes room for an encounter with God. It is often the tangible love of another human being that opens the door to the eternal love of God. That’s why relationships of nearness are so important in the Church today. We see it in the life of Pope Francis and know it to be true in our own lives. Isn’t it time we go out, draw near and reveal the God whose love draws all of us into nearness and encounter?

“We loved you so much that we were delighted to share with you not only the gospel of God but our lives as well, because you had become so dear to us.”
1 Thessalonians 2:8



[1] Pope Francis, “Address to the Coordinating Committee of CELAM,” Sumare Study Center: Rio de Janiero, July 28, 2013.
[2] Ibid.
[3] Mt 4:19.

Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Merton on the Mass



It isn’t very difficult to see that Merton has something quite pointed to say in this story (see my last post on The Art of Missing the Forest for the Trees).  On the surface, it would seem that the primary issue is racial equality and integration (keep in mind Merton told this story in the full tumult of the 1960s).  Yet Merton chose to direct his commentary toward the true lightening rod of the narrative: the Eucharist.  The churchgoers were so incensed by the priest’s sermon that they left prior to receiving the Eucharist, the body of Christ, the “source and summit of the Christian life.”[1]  Thus we have the consternated words of warning hurled at the priest as the offended parishioner stormed out, “If I miss Mass today it’s your fault!

There is an implication of guilt and punishment here.  The parting parishioner assumes that there will be a penalty to pay because he was not able to partake in the Eucharistic meal.  For those Catholic readers, the guilt of moral obligation will already be ringing in your ears.  Yet in a beautiful turn of parody, Merton uses this very idea of judgment in his response:

 Not only do we see in these men a flat refusal to listen to the plain meaning of the word of God. . . there is also a complete moral and spiritual insensitivity to the meaning of the Mass as the Christian Agape, the union of brothers in Christ, a union from which no believer is to be excluded.  To exclude a brother in Christ from this union is to fail to “judge the Body of Christ” and hence to “eat and drink judgment to oneself.” (1 Corinthians)[2]

The proverbial forest missed in Merton’s provocative story is nothing short of Christ and the kingdom of shalom which Christ so insistently preached, a kingdom which, projected into the 1960s, envisioned “little black boys and girls holding hands with little white boys and girls,” to quote Martin Luther King, Jr.  Eucharist is not a private ritual for personal sanctification.  It is the real presence of God with the power to mobilize the people of God to build a civilization of love.  That civilization is marked by reconciliation, right relationship, wholeness and justice. “The ritual action of Eucharist is powerful when it is allowed to penetrate the life and action of the people, and transform them into an effective embodiment of the love that is God, a sacrament of his presence.”[3]   There is an essential relationship between ritual, especially sacramental ritual as momentous as the Eucharist, and the lived realities of human beings which serve as primary witnesses to Christ’s presence among us.

I’ll let Merton get the last word, but I pray that we, the whole body of Christ, will take this universal meaning into our own lives and religious practice.

Is not their attendance at Mass a legal formality?  Formalities, abstractions, are not enough.  Gestures of conformity do not make a man a Christian, and when one’s actual conduct obviously belies the whole meaning of the gesture, it is an objective statement that one’s Christianity has lost it’s meaning.[4]



[1]             Lumen Gentium (The Dogmatic Constitution on the Church), 11.
[2]             Thomas Merton, Conjectures of a Guilty Bystander, NY: DoubleDay, 1966, 105.
[3]             Mary Peter McGinty, The Sacrament of Christian Life, Chicago, IL: The Thomas More Press, 1992, 50.
[4]             Thomas Merton, Conjectures of a Guilty Bystander, NY: DoubleDay, 1966, 105-106.